My apologies for the pun in the title, but usually league cup wins don't stir much emotion for a club with the prestige of Liverpool these days. However, given current form and results, it may have been just what the doctor ordered. Now then, don't let anyone fool you. There are still questions about Liverpool that need answering, but basking in the glow of a win makes those questions seem at least a bit less pressing.
Liverpool again failed to score in a first half where they dominated possession. Swansea City were more than content to sit back, defend and see if anything materialized via a counter attack. Nothing did materialize, of course, but the plan of attack worked so well that the Swans gained momentum and confidence during the last five to ten minutes of the first half. They carried that over into the second as well. Once again, taking nothing away from the run of play from Swansea since they set up a nice goal from Marvin Emnes, but a lack of commitment from the Reds defense on certain plays almost doomed them again.
While 25 minutes still remained following the goal, many supporters no doubt, had visions of another early cup exit for their beloved club. Liverpool had nothing to show at that point and to many did not seem capable of showing much more. Despite overwhelmingly positive possession, they were goalless in the first half and came out with little energy in the second. The Reds mustered little offense even after. But, to the joy of the Kopites, the night would not end in doom and gloom.
Mario Balotelli, of all people, came on in the 79th minute to score and equalize only 7 minutes later. The team and supporters had struggled through not only 21 minutes of desperation, seeking to knot up the game, but so many matches hoping the Italian enigma would perform. While it was still not his top form, the goal was a weight of so many shoulders. Mario is still seeking his first official Premier League goal since leaving Manchester City. But scoring the type of goal he did, in the fashion he in a moment when hope was dwindling has to boost his confidence at least a bit.
Dejan Lovren, another much maligned player, also got off the coal for Christmas list for awhile when he nodded in the game winner in the 95th minute, only seconds before the official's final whistle. Normally a win in the Capital Cup would just fall by the wayside. A win, coming from behind against Swansea City might even be seen as an unsuccessful match. However, given the recent run of form for Liverpool it must be looked at in a positive light.
The Reds did not give up. That has been something that supporters are most irked about in recent games. Liverpool's lack of fight once things don't go their way. The team did not let falling behind a goal end their night this match. Two much maligned players, two off-season high-profile signings, came through when the team needed them most. Much has been made over the quality of the summer signings, since many have either not performed up to snuff or simply have not made it off the bench. Lazar Markovic played reasonably well and showed signs of quality before making way for Adam Lallana. Loveran, rightly or wrongly, has been blamed for many of the defensive failings of Liverpool but provided a game winner and was solid at the back. Balotelli's woes in a red shirt have been well documented, but the man came up with a huge goal that while provided a beautiful ball by Fabio Borini, still needed a top class finish to hit the back of the net.
As previously stated, this win by no means erases all the questions that supporters have. It may even raise a few. The shape of the team is still a huge point of contention. Many, including this writer, support Brendan Rodgers and his decisions. However, the stubbornness to continue to play a one striker formation has some scratching their heads. Fabio Borini finally received a chance to play with Rickie Lambert but as a winger instead of a striker. Rogers is so concerned with getting his midfield players time on the pitch, it may be to the detriment of the team. The part I question in regard to the formation choice is the fact that Liverpool will play with two strikers when Daniel Sturridge eventually returns. So why avoid that formation so avidly when he is not there?
Other question marks remain as well. The defense, while better, still has gaps and lapses in judgement and marking. Set pieces still force one to hold their breath until the ball is clear. The team, as shown in last weekend's match against Hull, still woefully underperforms against lower teams. But despite all that, a normally unimportant Cup match may prove to be what this team needed. It was a confidence boost. It was a shot in the arm. While there is still much to work on during training sessions, the joy of a win makes things seem much less daunting. Confidence is something that was clearly lacking from several players in the squad. Supporters can now hope, even if only fleetingly, this will carry over to the weekend fixture against Newcastle. Liverpool must keep the confidence rolling. Matches won't become easier due to one league cup win, but perhaps players can feel a bit looser around the collar and just go out and perform now.
Hopefully Mario Balotelli can carry the confidence of an important goal, no matter the fixture, and silence a few critics. Being one of the few remaining fans of the man, I would love to sit here and gloat and say I told you so to the detractors. However, one goal does not give anyone that right. Balotelli must still perform in the league. This one match does show that the team needs him to perform for them to perform. If Balotelli can live up to any of his potential, it makes it that much easier for the rest of the team to do their jobs. Regardless of how you feel about the Liverpool striker, a good performance from him against Swansea was a good thing and will hopefully lead to better things for the player and the team going forward. Here's looking forward to the weekend. Walk on.
Wednesday, October 29, 2014
Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Takeaways from Champions League clash with Real Madrid
Well a wonderful night at Anfield was more or less taken down several pegs by poor performances all across the pitch. By now most of you, if not surely all of you, are aware that the Reds fell at home to Real Madrid by the score of 3-0. A Real team with no Gareth Bale no less. A Real team that had the potential to be looking ahead to an El Clasico match on the weekend with Barcelona. None of those factors ultimately helped out Liverpool.
The Reds came out on fire and seemed to soak in all the energy and enthusiasm, not only from the Kop, but from the entire stadium. Perhaps even the entire world, as many LFC fans gathered in front of various TV sets or computer screens or whatever media they chose to watch their beloved football club on with memories still dancing in their heads of a memorable performance against Madrid in Champions League history. It was not to be such a magical night on this eve at Anfield though. Liverpool lost their luster fairly quickly. Despite a good opportunity in the attacking third right off the bat, the Reds lost the gleam in their eyes after about 20 minutes of play and the technical prowess of the tactically gifted Galacticos took over.
While his detractors will no doubt say Dejan Lovren could have taken an extra step before trying to clear what would become Christiano Ronaldo's goa., more blame should be laid on the rest of the defense. They failed to follow the run in the first place while Lovren initially stepped out toward James Rodriguez. In the end, it was just a class chip with a top notch finish. While we, as fans, can second guess this or that, there was little to be done that would actually change the outcome of that play.
It was the second and third goals where blame squarely lays with Liverpool. Instead of only being down at the half 1-0, having created a couple decent chances themselves, the Reds continue to falter on set pieces and corners. Taking nothing away from Karim Benzema, but both of his goals could have been and should have been prevented by a team that wants to consider itself top class in the Premier League. Liverpool have failed too often on similar plays throughout the English league season and, despite their lack of scoring, have defense to blame for several poor performances including the 3-1 loss to West Ham and a less than sparkling 3-2 win over Queens Park. This can no longer be tolerated.
While I am quick to defend the manager, Brendan Rodgers, he continues a trend that is disturbingly familiar to this writer and the teams I follow in other sports. Slap some lipstick on the problem, get the supporters to drink the kool-aid and hope it all turns out better. Some times it works out ok, but more often than not you end up with the same problems you went into the offseason with. Set pieces and corners were a problem for Liverpool last season as well. Though I feel Lovren is a quality defender, he hasn't sorted out the problems with the Reds back four as a whole. Martin Skrtel is a decent defender as well. However, he is more concerned with giving the evil eye to the officials and tugging opponents shirts than the ball when it is in flight.
The third Real goal was a perfect example of what really ails Liverpool at the moment. Instead of defenders on their toes, ready to pounce on any loose ball to clear the area, they were flat footed. One may argue whether Simon Mingolet could have done better when diving out for a claim, but the bottom line is there were at least five red shirts all standing flat footed in the six yard area, flailing about and not clearing the ball. How it even bounced to Benzema, who was squarely between two red shirts, really is beyond me. If Liverpool defend those set pieces even remotely better, then this game is still most likely a loss, but a goal differential of -1 looks a lot better than -3. Especially having to go on the road to Real and Ludogorets still to come.
Other takeaways from this game, for me, are that Rodgers is too concerned with his midfield and their mentality. While Sterling, technically, began the game as a companion uptop with Mario he ultimately fell back into more of a midfield role as a winger on the opposite side of Coutinho. I still believe that Borini or Lambert need to be up top as a true striker until Sturridge gets back. If the midfield is so important to BR, then perhaps he could return to the 3-5-2 system he used at times last season. To be honest, the outcomes of the matches don't look like they would get much worse if that system was employed. These are the times I wish I could see training every day, because I can't understand why the strikers aren't options at the top alongside Balotelli or at the very least as his replacements.
In my humble opinion, too much is being placed on Balotelli. Too many people expect him to be Luis Suarez. Very few, if any, are a straight up replacement for Luis Suarez. For those who follow pro basketball, Suarez is comparable to Dennis Rodman. He presents so many problems to his team and headaches for the coach/manager. Yet, his effort and results in-game are second to none. Balotelli simply isn't that player. Even when in top form, Balotelli has never presented himself as a go all-out every second of every game type of player. Right now the man can do no right. By no means did he have a great game against Real, but he was not the reason for the loss and the entire team had a bad game. Against QPR, Balotelli was accused of being too selfish and taking too many poor shots in his effort to get off his goalless stint. On Wednesday he attempted to include his teammates more often and is accused of not being ruthless enough and not showing enough effort.
If we take all bias out of it, then Balotelli has not performed up to snuff. Nobody in a red shirt has lately. The defense has been poor across the board. Raheem Sterling is attempting to do too much and more often than not, either trying to emulate Suarez by going to ground too early or taking too many dribbles right into the path of a defender's foot. Many are praising Adam Lallana's effort against Madrid. On the Liverpool Echo's webpage, he is even in the top three for player ratings, but it led to nothing. He too was guilty of taking balls too close to a defender. Effort does not always mean quality play. This isn't a youth league where we praise someone for running with reckless abandon the entire game.
One could write an entire article on Glen Johnson. The man is a wing midfielder at best and no longer seems capable of playing a solid wingback for Liverpool. Why Manquillo has fallen out of favor leaves some scratching their heads and even Enrique seems like a better man marker than Johnson. What is currently maddening about this club is the talent is there. It is just not coming together. Before the season I boldly claimed that Liverpool would not be this season's Tottenham. Perhaps I was wrong.
Maybe there really are too many new additions to gel together cohesively. Balotelli has loads of talent, but is slowly slipping into a sulk state. Sterling is in poor form and/or trying to put too much on himself. Gerrard looks top class one minute and then clueless defensively another. It seems I still believe a combination of Balotelli and Sturridge will produce goals. I would still have Sterling on the wing of the diamond in a 4-4-2 since he has proven he is willing to get back and help defend. I now think Coutinho should be the diamond's tip and some rotation of the remaining midfielders can be rotated on the opposite wing, depending on form. Rodgers has some work to do. A win on the weekend against Hull will quiet the blood lust of the masses. However, the entire team needs to find its way. Regardless of effort or talent, Luis Suarez should not be that much of a difference from last year to this. Rodgers needs to be a better leader than he is right now and the players need to perform up to their talent levels individually because no one player shoulders all the blame right now.
One or two things cleaned up and this team could be on a completely different note. But that's how football/soccer/sports in general go. By the knife's edge are things decided at times. The season is young enough for quality changes to be made and Liverpool must make them quickly. With so much opportunity to maintain a European presence, it would be a shame for this Champions League season be their last for another year. Walk on.
The Reds came out on fire and seemed to soak in all the energy and enthusiasm, not only from the Kop, but from the entire stadium. Perhaps even the entire world, as many LFC fans gathered in front of various TV sets or computer screens or whatever media they chose to watch their beloved football club on with memories still dancing in their heads of a memorable performance against Madrid in Champions League history. It was not to be such a magical night on this eve at Anfield though. Liverpool lost their luster fairly quickly. Despite a good opportunity in the attacking third right off the bat, the Reds lost the gleam in their eyes after about 20 minutes of play and the technical prowess of the tactically gifted Galacticos took over.
While his detractors will no doubt say Dejan Lovren could have taken an extra step before trying to clear what would become Christiano Ronaldo's goa., more blame should be laid on the rest of the defense. They failed to follow the run in the first place while Lovren initially stepped out toward James Rodriguez. In the end, it was just a class chip with a top notch finish. While we, as fans, can second guess this or that, there was little to be done that would actually change the outcome of that play.
It was the second and third goals where blame squarely lays with Liverpool. Instead of only being down at the half 1-0, having created a couple decent chances themselves, the Reds continue to falter on set pieces and corners. Taking nothing away from Karim Benzema, but both of his goals could have been and should have been prevented by a team that wants to consider itself top class in the Premier League. Liverpool have failed too often on similar plays throughout the English league season and, despite their lack of scoring, have defense to blame for several poor performances including the 3-1 loss to West Ham and a less than sparkling 3-2 win over Queens Park. This can no longer be tolerated.
While I am quick to defend the manager, Brendan Rodgers, he continues a trend that is disturbingly familiar to this writer and the teams I follow in other sports. Slap some lipstick on the problem, get the supporters to drink the kool-aid and hope it all turns out better. Some times it works out ok, but more often than not you end up with the same problems you went into the offseason with. Set pieces and corners were a problem for Liverpool last season as well. Though I feel Lovren is a quality defender, he hasn't sorted out the problems with the Reds back four as a whole. Martin Skrtel is a decent defender as well. However, he is more concerned with giving the evil eye to the officials and tugging opponents shirts than the ball when it is in flight.
The third Real goal was a perfect example of what really ails Liverpool at the moment. Instead of defenders on their toes, ready to pounce on any loose ball to clear the area, they were flat footed. One may argue whether Simon Mingolet could have done better when diving out for a claim, but the bottom line is there were at least five red shirts all standing flat footed in the six yard area, flailing about and not clearing the ball. How it even bounced to Benzema, who was squarely between two red shirts, really is beyond me. If Liverpool defend those set pieces even remotely better, then this game is still most likely a loss, but a goal differential of -1 looks a lot better than -3. Especially having to go on the road to Real and Ludogorets still to come.
Other takeaways from this game, for me, are that Rodgers is too concerned with his midfield and their mentality. While Sterling, technically, began the game as a companion uptop with Mario he ultimately fell back into more of a midfield role as a winger on the opposite side of Coutinho. I still believe that Borini or Lambert need to be up top as a true striker until Sturridge gets back. If the midfield is so important to BR, then perhaps he could return to the 3-5-2 system he used at times last season. To be honest, the outcomes of the matches don't look like they would get much worse if that system was employed. These are the times I wish I could see training every day, because I can't understand why the strikers aren't options at the top alongside Balotelli or at the very least as his replacements.
In my humble opinion, too much is being placed on Balotelli. Too many people expect him to be Luis Suarez. Very few, if any, are a straight up replacement for Luis Suarez. For those who follow pro basketball, Suarez is comparable to Dennis Rodman. He presents so many problems to his team and headaches for the coach/manager. Yet, his effort and results in-game are second to none. Balotelli simply isn't that player. Even when in top form, Balotelli has never presented himself as a go all-out every second of every game type of player. Right now the man can do no right. By no means did he have a great game against Real, but he was not the reason for the loss and the entire team had a bad game. Against QPR, Balotelli was accused of being too selfish and taking too many poor shots in his effort to get off his goalless stint. On Wednesday he attempted to include his teammates more often and is accused of not being ruthless enough and not showing enough effort.
If we take all bias out of it, then Balotelli has not performed up to snuff. Nobody in a red shirt has lately. The defense has been poor across the board. Raheem Sterling is attempting to do too much and more often than not, either trying to emulate Suarez by going to ground too early or taking too many dribbles right into the path of a defender's foot. Many are praising Adam Lallana's effort against Madrid. On the Liverpool Echo's webpage, he is even in the top three for player ratings, but it led to nothing. He too was guilty of taking balls too close to a defender. Effort does not always mean quality play. This isn't a youth league where we praise someone for running with reckless abandon the entire game.
One could write an entire article on Glen Johnson. The man is a wing midfielder at best and no longer seems capable of playing a solid wingback for Liverpool. Why Manquillo has fallen out of favor leaves some scratching their heads and even Enrique seems like a better man marker than Johnson. What is currently maddening about this club is the talent is there. It is just not coming together. Before the season I boldly claimed that Liverpool would not be this season's Tottenham. Perhaps I was wrong.
Maybe there really are too many new additions to gel together cohesively. Balotelli has loads of talent, but is slowly slipping into a sulk state. Sterling is in poor form and/or trying to put too much on himself. Gerrard looks top class one minute and then clueless defensively another. It seems I still believe a combination of Balotelli and Sturridge will produce goals. I would still have Sterling on the wing of the diamond in a 4-4-2 since he has proven he is willing to get back and help defend. I now think Coutinho should be the diamond's tip and some rotation of the remaining midfielders can be rotated on the opposite wing, depending on form. Rodgers has some work to do. A win on the weekend against Hull will quiet the blood lust of the masses. However, the entire team needs to find its way. Regardless of effort or talent, Luis Suarez should not be that much of a difference from last year to this. Rodgers needs to be a better leader than he is right now and the players need to perform up to their talent levels individually because no one player shoulders all the blame right now.
One or two things cleaned up and this team could be on a completely different note. But that's how football/soccer/sports in general go. By the knife's edge are things decided at times. The season is young enough for quality changes to be made and Liverpool must make them quickly. With so much opportunity to maintain a European presence, it would be a shame for this Champions League season be their last for another year. Walk on.
Monday, October 20, 2014
Time for Liverpool to go with two strikers
Liverpool FC needs to go with two strikers. Now. Brendan Rodgers proved last season he was more than capable of molding and forming his squads to fit the needs to defeat the opponent on the day. While he has tried this again this season, to varying forms of success, he has seemed more stubborn in sticking with the lone striker at the top. Some of the blame can be shouldered by an under-performing Mario Balotelli, but not as much as many fans want to heap upon him.
The Italian enigma has not proven to be the goal scorer he once was with City or even with Milan, but he still has talent in him. Too many fans see his poor form as the only or at least the main reason for Liverpool's poor start to the Premier League season. False. Raheem Sterling has been less than stellar. While he is still extremely talented and deserving of the first team minutes, he has been less than top notch on the ball in many moments during key games. He has dribbled into many defenders and many first touches prior to this last international break went too far off foot or even off knees.
Many of the new signees have not lived up to expectations either. Blame is planted squarely on Balotelli because he is an easy target, but Rickie Lambert has done nothing to show he should be a lone striker. He was given an opportunity against West Brom and did little to inspire any hope he would do any better than Balotelli. The argument that he was cheaper than Balo is weak at best, as well.
Fabio Borini has done even less to figure into a starting role as a lone striker. While many still want to believe he has the talent to be a quality player, he has not shown the quality on the pitch yet in terms of being a featured player. So with so few options to replace Balotelli, barring a move in January, what are Liverpool left to do?
They cannot continue to slog along at the current pace, despite the fact they have managed to jump up to fifth place in the leage after a disheartening win over QPR. Daniel Sturridge is still two weeks away from a return, if the Reds are lucky. Chances are they won't be. So again, what are the options. I feel we've seen enough of the lone striker formation to know it's not really going to work with anyone alone up top right now. Not with Raheem, Mario, Borini or Lambert.
Some will argue that the two striker formation was used and did not work as well, but I don't think one game where nobody was in good form is a good example. BR can try whatever midfield formation he sees fit, but I think the team currently needs two up top. I think Mario needs to keep starting the league games. He can be paired with any of the attacking options. You can have Borini or Lambert play evenly up top with him or use Sterling in a purely advanced role with the option to use the entire field as well. I think this will give more space to Balotelli, who currently is trying too hard to take on the several defenders who surround him.
I think LFC will be better off once they regain more health throughout the team as they will be given the options everyone thought they would have at the beginning of the year. Jon Flanagan's return means you can use a nice rotation at the wingback position that would not necessarily demand using Manquillo and Moreno at the same time to the potential defensive detriment of the club. Allen gives the team more options in the midfield. Players just need to start stepping up. While I understand the modern footballer needs to be comfortable to be at his best, there simply are not enough central midfield spots for everyone to play and be in their preferred spot.
Sterling and Coutinho have the pace and skill where they need to be utilized as the wings of the midfield. My preferred starting lineup would be Balotelli and Borini starting up top. If Rodgers wants to employ the diamond, then Henderson or Coutinho can play the tip, Sterling and Henderson/Coutinho would be the wings and Steven Gerrard would be the holding midfielder in front of the back four. I could do a whole different blog about the defense, so I'll leave those choices to Rodgers and the readers.
Yet the bigger question, regardless of who we contend should be up top, is why there is such a rush to judgement over everything regarding football. Yes, you need good starts to seasons so more work is not needed later in the year. However, the grass is not always greener. Some already say Balotelli should be dealt. Really? Even if Liverpool bring in one striker during the January period, why not keep the depth? Sturridge seems injury prone now and Borini/Lambert aren't any more reliable yet. Too many people are quick to jump the gun. As an American supporter, I have more examples than I care to name where teams and/or Universities I support thought they were better off dropping a player or coach only to be proven completely wrong. Give things time to grow. After all, even in the footballing world, the juggernaut of Manchester United has proven that knee-jerk reactions don't always yield immediate results.
The Italian enigma has not proven to be the goal scorer he once was with City or even with Milan, but he still has talent in him. Too many fans see his poor form as the only or at least the main reason for Liverpool's poor start to the Premier League season. False. Raheem Sterling has been less than stellar. While he is still extremely talented and deserving of the first team minutes, he has been less than top notch on the ball in many moments during key games. He has dribbled into many defenders and many first touches prior to this last international break went too far off foot or even off knees.
Many of the new signees have not lived up to expectations either. Blame is planted squarely on Balotelli because he is an easy target, but Rickie Lambert has done nothing to show he should be a lone striker. He was given an opportunity against West Brom and did little to inspire any hope he would do any better than Balotelli. The argument that he was cheaper than Balo is weak at best, as well.
Fabio Borini has done even less to figure into a starting role as a lone striker. While many still want to believe he has the talent to be a quality player, he has not shown the quality on the pitch yet in terms of being a featured player. So with so few options to replace Balotelli, barring a move in January, what are Liverpool left to do?
They cannot continue to slog along at the current pace, despite the fact they have managed to jump up to fifth place in the leage after a disheartening win over QPR. Daniel Sturridge is still two weeks away from a return, if the Reds are lucky. Chances are they won't be. So again, what are the options. I feel we've seen enough of the lone striker formation to know it's not really going to work with anyone alone up top right now. Not with Raheem, Mario, Borini or Lambert.
Some will argue that the two striker formation was used and did not work as well, but I don't think one game where nobody was in good form is a good example. BR can try whatever midfield formation he sees fit, but I think the team currently needs two up top. I think Mario needs to keep starting the league games. He can be paired with any of the attacking options. You can have Borini or Lambert play evenly up top with him or use Sterling in a purely advanced role with the option to use the entire field as well. I think this will give more space to Balotelli, who currently is trying too hard to take on the several defenders who surround him.
I think LFC will be better off once they regain more health throughout the team as they will be given the options everyone thought they would have at the beginning of the year. Jon Flanagan's return means you can use a nice rotation at the wingback position that would not necessarily demand using Manquillo and Moreno at the same time to the potential defensive detriment of the club. Allen gives the team more options in the midfield. Players just need to start stepping up. While I understand the modern footballer needs to be comfortable to be at his best, there simply are not enough central midfield spots for everyone to play and be in their preferred spot.
Sterling and Coutinho have the pace and skill where they need to be utilized as the wings of the midfield. My preferred starting lineup would be Balotelli and Borini starting up top. If Rodgers wants to employ the diamond, then Henderson or Coutinho can play the tip, Sterling and Henderson/Coutinho would be the wings and Steven Gerrard would be the holding midfielder in front of the back four. I could do a whole different blog about the defense, so I'll leave those choices to Rodgers and the readers.
Yet the bigger question, regardless of who we contend should be up top, is why there is such a rush to judgement over everything regarding football. Yes, you need good starts to seasons so more work is not needed later in the year. However, the grass is not always greener. Some already say Balotelli should be dealt. Really? Even if Liverpool bring in one striker during the January period, why not keep the depth? Sturridge seems injury prone now and Borini/Lambert aren't any more reliable yet. Too many people are quick to jump the gun. As an American supporter, I have more examples than I care to name where teams and/or Universities I support thought they were better off dropping a player or coach only to be proven completely wrong. Give things time to grow. After all, even in the footballing world, the juggernaut of Manchester United has proven that knee-jerk reactions don't always yield immediate results.
Wednesday, October 15, 2014
Hodgson vs Rodgers from Across the Pond
Let me first say, that as an American, I don't always feel like I have the full story of things going on in European football. I think websites like ESPN FC and This is Anfield do a spectacular job, but not being surrounded by all the news you are still left to wonder if portions of a story are left out. That being said, this feud between England's manager and seemingly the entire Liverpool club is becoming ridiculous, if it was not already so.
Being a Liverpool supporter, perhaps my viewpoint is slanted, but Roy Hodgson, with every statement he makes, comes off more as a man desperate to somehow hold his job as opposed to a manager with a plan to win games and progress England forward. Whether by design or by happenstance, Hodgson seems to cement the murmurs of the rumors that he has a grudge against Liverpool. Trying to test a player's resolve by forcing him to train and/or play while you know he has an injury comes of as antiquated thinking at best and petty at worst.
There will always be spats between club and country. The very makeup of having different managers with different philosophies and different styles lends itself to these confrontations. Even US Soccer, though still in our toddler stages compared to other FA's, has seen a spike in club vs country issues, especially under Jurgen Klinsmann. But those problems have more to do with actual issues like contract dollars in MLS vs quality of play and amount of play in Europe. This Hodgson fued, that seemingly only has to do with Liverpool players and the club, seems more and more like an actual feud with the club and anyone associated with it.
At least in American media, there are no reports of any disputes with Tottenham or Wenger at Arsenal or Van Gaal at United. No words have been spoken by Hodgson over the lack of deveolpment by any BPL clubs to develop more English keepers or veiled attacks on City for not somehow correcting the mistakes that Joe Hart likes to make. It all seems centered on the Reds. How childish for someone of, not only Hodgdon's age but his pedigree. No, he hasn't had sparkling records everywhere he has gone, but he has won almost twice as many games as he has lost in his managerial career. But, whether by grudge or by a feeling of mounting pressure for his job, the man has sunk to media attacks on players he must rely on if he is to keep his job.
While some may argue their overall quality, the bottom line is that when in form, there aren't many players in the English FA better than Daniel Sturridge and Raheem Sterling. At least at the moment, there are not. Things are obviously fluid in football. But Hodgson needs them to perform well for England to perform well. Yet here he is, trying to test their resolve and coming out in the media to shame them for not manning up. Managers have many odd ways of getting players to play their best, but these hardly come off as ways of doing so.
I have long been a proponent of the idea that modern players are too coddled and selfish. That they need to play through a bit of pain. However, those days are no more. Players today do play through more pain than we probably know. As weekend warriors we often whine about the aches and pains come Monday. Even though these are super-fit athletes, to think they don't suffer from the same ailments is foolishness. The days of "rub some dirt on it kid" are gone. Players are in control and Hodgson's ways of dealing with the realities he has been faced with are very unbecoming of a manager of any national level, let alone with the pedigree of the English FA.
This feud cannot continue. Perhaps Liverpool does need to tweak their training regime. It is obviously not all on England, when players like Loveran and Markovic go down as well. However, that is up to Brendan Rodgers and him alone. It is not for Roy Hodgson to worry about. It is not for Roy Hodgson to question. Roy Hodgson needs to worry about his own camp, his own training regimes and focus on moving England forward. He is obviously not doing a bang-up job, so to speak, if he has England at the top of their group with 9 points and people still clamoring for his job. Be a man Mr. Hodgson. Leave the petty feuds of the past at your doorstep.
Being a Liverpool supporter, perhaps my viewpoint is slanted, but Roy Hodgson, with every statement he makes, comes off more as a man desperate to somehow hold his job as opposed to a manager with a plan to win games and progress England forward. Whether by design or by happenstance, Hodgson seems to cement the murmurs of the rumors that he has a grudge against Liverpool. Trying to test a player's resolve by forcing him to train and/or play while you know he has an injury comes of as antiquated thinking at best and petty at worst.
There will always be spats between club and country. The very makeup of having different managers with different philosophies and different styles lends itself to these confrontations. Even US Soccer, though still in our toddler stages compared to other FA's, has seen a spike in club vs country issues, especially under Jurgen Klinsmann. But those problems have more to do with actual issues like contract dollars in MLS vs quality of play and amount of play in Europe. This Hodgson fued, that seemingly only has to do with Liverpool players and the club, seems more and more like an actual feud with the club and anyone associated with it.
At least in American media, there are no reports of any disputes with Tottenham or Wenger at Arsenal or Van Gaal at United. No words have been spoken by Hodgson over the lack of deveolpment by any BPL clubs to develop more English keepers or veiled attacks on City for not somehow correcting the mistakes that Joe Hart likes to make. It all seems centered on the Reds. How childish for someone of, not only Hodgdon's age but his pedigree. No, he hasn't had sparkling records everywhere he has gone, but he has won almost twice as many games as he has lost in his managerial career. But, whether by grudge or by a feeling of mounting pressure for his job, the man has sunk to media attacks on players he must rely on if he is to keep his job.
While some may argue their overall quality, the bottom line is that when in form, there aren't many players in the English FA better than Daniel Sturridge and Raheem Sterling. At least at the moment, there are not. Things are obviously fluid in football. But Hodgson needs them to perform well for England to perform well. Yet here he is, trying to test their resolve and coming out in the media to shame them for not manning up. Managers have many odd ways of getting players to play their best, but these hardly come off as ways of doing so.
I have long been a proponent of the idea that modern players are too coddled and selfish. That they need to play through a bit of pain. However, those days are no more. Players today do play through more pain than we probably know. As weekend warriors we often whine about the aches and pains come Monday. Even though these are super-fit athletes, to think they don't suffer from the same ailments is foolishness. The days of "rub some dirt on it kid" are gone. Players are in control and Hodgson's ways of dealing with the realities he has been faced with are very unbecoming of a manager of any national level, let alone with the pedigree of the English FA.
This feud cannot continue. Perhaps Liverpool does need to tweak their training regime. It is obviously not all on England, when players like Loveran and Markovic go down as well. However, that is up to Brendan Rodgers and him alone. It is not for Roy Hodgson to worry about. It is not for Roy Hodgson to question. Roy Hodgson needs to worry about his own camp, his own training regimes and focus on moving England forward. He is obviously not doing a bang-up job, so to speak, if he has England at the top of their group with 9 points and people still clamoring for his job. Be a man Mr. Hodgson. Leave the petty feuds of the past at your doorstep.
Tuesday, October 14, 2014
Promotion/relegation in the US will not work...yet.
I recently engaged in a fun, spirited debate on Twitter and figured I would expound on my thoughts in this forum. With the rise of popularity in soccer in America, the debate has been reformed as to whether a promotion/relegation system would work in American soccer. Before I go into my reasoning, let me give a very rudimentary explanation of what that system is.
All throughout European leagues and several others around the world, there is what is called a promotion/relegation system. If we use the English leagues as our example, then there are tiers. The Premier League is at the top. Then the Championship, then League One and League Two. Now each league throughout the world has different numbers, but on average it is about two to three teams that move up and down. In our example, if Southhampton, Cardiff and Swansea are the three worst teams in the Premier League, then they would be relegated to the Championship the next season. By the same token, the top three or so in the Championship would be promoted to the Premier League. The same is true of the bottom teams in the Championship going to League One and their top teams promoted to the Championship and so on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promotion_and_relegation : Here is a link to the different pro/rel systems throughout the world. Now then, on to the point that I argue. While soccer is gaining steam within the US, it is not to a point where this kind of system would be accepted. Soccer has gained notoriety through the US National Team's performance at the last two World Cups. It has picked up steam with an improvement in quality of MLS teams. Also, the top European leagues are readily available on regular cable and satellite TV packages now, making it much easier to see the top names/teams in the world from the comfort of your own couch or at your local sports bar.
But soccer is not there yet in America. While we, as fans and players, strive to make it ever more popular and mainstream, at this juncture it is still a fourth rated sport at best. The NFL is still king in the US. After that, depending on your own personal preferences, there is the MLB, NBA and NHL just to name professional leagues and not even taking into account the huge popularity of college athletics. Now I have long argued that there is enough room in our sporting hearts to support many sports equally and with the same passion and fervor. Yet, the reality is there is only so many dollars to go around and right now those dollars are precious to a league like Major League Soccer when they are still in competition for eyeballs and butts.
MLS, while gaining success and mainstream notoriety, is still in its infant stages. Promotion/relegation would hinder that growth within America because it would limit the sport we hold so dear to only the most passionate fan who both cares deeply for their team and for the sport as a whole. MLS is still in dire need of the average fan and it is my contention that the average fan would not understand or support their local team under a pro/rel circumstance. Although proponents of the system like to throw around buzz words, like elitists and call people MLS cronies for supporting their one corporation approach to the league, the bottom line is it has worked and worked reasonably well.
Yes, there were failures along the way as there would be for any league/business model trying to build from the ground up. However, nobody throughout the world can argue with the success and number of right moves (with the exception of on the field quality) the the MLS has made to this point. Trying to jam American soccer into the European mold this early would just spoil things. There is a growing passion for the sport and for local clubs. Promotion/relegation would just dam the stream before letting it grow into a river. The argument made to me, while valid, says no open league system has ever been shut down due to lack of support.
That's an apples and oranges comparison. The rest of the world has such a connection and passion for the game, that not supporting their club doesn't register on most fans' minds. Trying to apply that here in America just doesn't stick yet. Your average fan is perfectly willing to not attend the game of whatever their favorite team may be because they have plenty of other options. St. Louis Cardinal fans are often labeled as the best in baseball. And while that may be true in some instances, if anyone says they show up through thick and thin and sell out every single game, then I have a bridge to Hawaii you can drive on. If the Cardinals are losing and the St. Louis Blues hockey team is hot or the St. Louis Rams football team is on a winning streak, then butts will be in those seats and not at Busch Stadium and vice versa. It is true in all other pro sports towns and regarding all other pro sports franchises in America.
You have to take the hardcore fans out of this argument. The hardcore fan will support their team no matter what level they play against, win or lose, thick or thin. But hardcore fans, in any sport, are just not numerous enough or possess the amount of pocket money necessary to fully base a club or franchise's financial well being on. The argument that no open league has collapsed also just doesn't really apply to the US landscape either. There are plenty of teams and leagues at all levels in America that have fallen by the wayside. The old NASL had some of the biggest names in soccer playing for it at one point or the other, yet fell apart. Hockey is littered with the carcasses of former teams and leagues. RIP to the IHL and CHL as well as team after team after team. Let us not forget Miami and Tampa Bay and San Jose in the early days of MLS too.
Also, there just aren't the type of facilities or fan base for each and every team to think they would succeed. A team that plays in front of 2,000 in the USL (no matter how passionate those 2,000 are) just won't be on the same level financially and/or stability wise as a team that averages 15-20,000. And not to be snobbish, but anyone who thinks a team that averages those numbers at the MLS level would keep the numbers if they were playing in the USL is just foolish. Again, there aren't enough hardcore fans to support it yet.
In reality, the argument that MLS and North American soccer must have promotion/relegation right now is more elitist than the other side of it. It would not surprise me if many of the people who advocate pro/rel right now are the same ones who think MLS has to go to the same schedule as European leagues (which would crush MLS under the NFL's mighty boot instead of only having to go up against baseball). Now before people label me as not understanding the sport or not being a fan or falsely only thinking I support the one corporation system of MLS, let me say you have no idea.
I am for promotion/relegation. While I think MLS should keep playing during the summer, I do support a more FIFA oriented schedule where there are breaks during international play. I would not be opposed to MLS letting their franchises' gain full control down the road. But therein is the key words: down the road. Let the league keep growing. Let the fervor for professional squads keep growing in towns and cities like Sacramento and St. Louis and coast-to-coast. Let the league get to their desired number of teams before we talk of such things as an entirely new system of leagues. Let each city gain the kind of facilities necessary to compete at various levels of competition. Let's just let it keep growing for awhile. Right now, a great concept on paper: the CONCACAF Champions League, isn't really off and running. It just doesn't matter yet. I'd rather a tournament like that take off before we try to jam the European model into the US soccer landscape. People are too quick to want things the way they want it now. Just chill and enjoy the growth of the game. Maybe promotion/relegation will come before we expect. Many didn't think MLS would reach the heights it has. But don't expect more of this league before the league itself is financially ready or all teams across the nation are ready from a stability standpoint.
And as always, remember that these are just opinions. But mine is right.
All throughout European leagues and several others around the world, there is what is called a promotion/relegation system. If we use the English leagues as our example, then there are tiers. The Premier League is at the top. Then the Championship, then League One and League Two. Now each league throughout the world has different numbers, but on average it is about two to three teams that move up and down. In our example, if Southhampton, Cardiff and Swansea are the three worst teams in the Premier League, then they would be relegated to the Championship the next season. By the same token, the top three or so in the Championship would be promoted to the Premier League. The same is true of the bottom teams in the Championship going to League One and their top teams promoted to the Championship and so on.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Promotion_and_relegation : Here is a link to the different pro/rel systems throughout the world. Now then, on to the point that I argue. While soccer is gaining steam within the US, it is not to a point where this kind of system would be accepted. Soccer has gained notoriety through the US National Team's performance at the last two World Cups. It has picked up steam with an improvement in quality of MLS teams. Also, the top European leagues are readily available on regular cable and satellite TV packages now, making it much easier to see the top names/teams in the world from the comfort of your own couch or at your local sports bar.
But soccer is not there yet in America. While we, as fans and players, strive to make it ever more popular and mainstream, at this juncture it is still a fourth rated sport at best. The NFL is still king in the US. After that, depending on your own personal preferences, there is the MLB, NBA and NHL just to name professional leagues and not even taking into account the huge popularity of college athletics. Now I have long argued that there is enough room in our sporting hearts to support many sports equally and with the same passion and fervor. Yet, the reality is there is only so many dollars to go around and right now those dollars are precious to a league like Major League Soccer when they are still in competition for eyeballs and butts.
MLS, while gaining success and mainstream notoriety, is still in its infant stages. Promotion/relegation would hinder that growth within America because it would limit the sport we hold so dear to only the most passionate fan who both cares deeply for their team and for the sport as a whole. MLS is still in dire need of the average fan and it is my contention that the average fan would not understand or support their local team under a pro/rel circumstance. Although proponents of the system like to throw around buzz words, like elitists and call people MLS cronies for supporting their one corporation approach to the league, the bottom line is it has worked and worked reasonably well.
Yes, there were failures along the way as there would be for any league/business model trying to build from the ground up. However, nobody throughout the world can argue with the success and number of right moves (with the exception of on the field quality) the the MLS has made to this point. Trying to jam American soccer into the European mold this early would just spoil things. There is a growing passion for the sport and for local clubs. Promotion/relegation would just dam the stream before letting it grow into a river. The argument made to me, while valid, says no open league system has ever been shut down due to lack of support.
That's an apples and oranges comparison. The rest of the world has such a connection and passion for the game, that not supporting their club doesn't register on most fans' minds. Trying to apply that here in America just doesn't stick yet. Your average fan is perfectly willing to not attend the game of whatever their favorite team may be because they have plenty of other options. St. Louis Cardinal fans are often labeled as the best in baseball. And while that may be true in some instances, if anyone says they show up through thick and thin and sell out every single game, then I have a bridge to Hawaii you can drive on. If the Cardinals are losing and the St. Louis Blues hockey team is hot or the St. Louis Rams football team is on a winning streak, then butts will be in those seats and not at Busch Stadium and vice versa. It is true in all other pro sports towns and regarding all other pro sports franchises in America.
You have to take the hardcore fans out of this argument. The hardcore fan will support their team no matter what level they play against, win or lose, thick or thin. But hardcore fans, in any sport, are just not numerous enough or possess the amount of pocket money necessary to fully base a club or franchise's financial well being on. The argument that no open league has collapsed also just doesn't really apply to the US landscape either. There are plenty of teams and leagues at all levels in America that have fallen by the wayside. The old NASL had some of the biggest names in soccer playing for it at one point or the other, yet fell apart. Hockey is littered with the carcasses of former teams and leagues. RIP to the IHL and CHL as well as team after team after team. Let us not forget Miami and Tampa Bay and San Jose in the early days of MLS too.
Also, there just aren't the type of facilities or fan base for each and every team to think they would succeed. A team that plays in front of 2,000 in the USL (no matter how passionate those 2,000 are) just won't be on the same level financially and/or stability wise as a team that averages 15-20,000. And not to be snobbish, but anyone who thinks a team that averages those numbers at the MLS level would keep the numbers if they were playing in the USL is just foolish. Again, there aren't enough hardcore fans to support it yet.
In reality, the argument that MLS and North American soccer must have promotion/relegation right now is more elitist than the other side of it. It would not surprise me if many of the people who advocate pro/rel right now are the same ones who think MLS has to go to the same schedule as European leagues (which would crush MLS under the NFL's mighty boot instead of only having to go up against baseball). Now before people label me as not understanding the sport or not being a fan or falsely only thinking I support the one corporation system of MLS, let me say you have no idea.
I am for promotion/relegation. While I think MLS should keep playing during the summer, I do support a more FIFA oriented schedule where there are breaks during international play. I would not be opposed to MLS letting their franchises' gain full control down the road. But therein is the key words: down the road. Let the league keep growing. Let the fervor for professional squads keep growing in towns and cities like Sacramento and St. Louis and coast-to-coast. Let the league get to their desired number of teams before we talk of such things as an entirely new system of leagues. Let each city gain the kind of facilities necessary to compete at various levels of competition. Let's just let it keep growing for awhile. Right now, a great concept on paper: the CONCACAF Champions League, isn't really off and running. It just doesn't matter yet. I'd rather a tournament like that take off before we try to jam the European model into the US soccer landscape. People are too quick to want things the way they want it now. Just chill and enjoy the growth of the game. Maybe promotion/relegation will come before we expect. Many didn't think MLS would reach the heights it has. But don't expect more of this league before the league itself is financially ready or all teams across the nation are ready from a stability standpoint.
And as always, remember that these are just opinions. But mine is right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
